Nauka – razlika između verzija
Uklonjeni sadržaj Dodani sadržaj
Nema sažetka izmjene |
|||
Red 1:
{{rut}}
[[File:The Scientific Universe.png|thumb|500px|Skala Univerzuma – maprana prema granama nauke]]
'''Nauka''' ili '''znanost''' (lat.: ''scientia'' = znanje; grč.: λoγοs – ''logos'' = nauka, znanje, znanost, učenje) je sistem sređenih isistematiziranih znanja o nama i (matrijalnom i nematerijalnom) svijetu koji nas okružuje. T o je obimna i opsežna skupina [[informacija]] i o nekom subjektu, ali se ta riječ posebno koristila za informacije o fizičkom [[univerzum]]u. Kako se znanje povećavalo, pojedine metode su se dokazale pouzdanije nego neke druge, i danas su naučne metode standard za nauku. To uključuje korištenje pažljivog posmatranja, eksperimente, mjerenja, [[matematika|matematiku]], i ponavljanje.
Linija 16 ⟶ 17:
[[File:Pangea animation 03.gif|thumb|300px|Animacija koja prikazuje kretanje kontinenata od separacije [[Pangaea]] današnjeg dana.]]
Science in a broad sense existed before the [[modern era]], and in many historical [[civilization]]s.<ref>"The historian ... requires a very broad definition of "science" — one that ... will help us to understand the modern scientific enterprise. We need to be broad and inclusive, rather than narrow and exclusive ... and we should expect that the farther back we go [in time] the broader we will need to be." — David Pingree (1992), "Hellenophilia versus the History of Science" ''Isis'' '''83''' 554–63, as cited on p.3,
=== Prefilozofiska istorija ===
Linija 29 ⟶ 30:
=== Filozofski zaokret ka ljudskim pitanjima ===
[[File:Aristotle Altemps Inv8575.jpg|thumb|170px|[[Aristotle]], 384 BC – 322 BC, - one of the early figures in the development of the [[scientific method]].<ref>"[http://www.pbs.org/saf/1307/features/knows.htm The Origins of Science]". ''
A major turning point in the history of early philosophical science was the controversial but successful attempt by [[Socrates]] to apply philosophy to the study of human things, including human nature, the nature of political communities, and human knowledge itself. He criticized the older type of study of physics as too purely speculative, and lacking in self-criticism. He was particularly concerned that some of the early physicists treated nature as if it could be assumed that it had no intelligent order, explaining things merely in terms of motion and matter. The study of human things had been the realm of mythology and tradition, and Socrates was executed.<ref>[http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Plat.Apol.30e&lang=original Plato, ''Apology'' 30e]</ref> [[Aristotle]] later created a less controversial systematic programme of Socratic philosophy, which was [[teleological]], and human-centred. He rejected many of the conclusions of earlier scientists. For example in his physics the sun goes around the earth, and many things have it as part of their nature that they are for humans. Each thing has a [[formal cause]] and [[final cause]] and a role in the rational cosmic order. Motion and change is described as the [[actualization]] of potentials already in things, according to what types of things they are. While the Socratics insisted that philosophy should be used to consider the practical question of the best way to live for a human being (a study Aristotle divided into [[ethics]] and [[political philosophy]]), they did not argue for any other types of [[applied science]].
Linija 35 ⟶ 36:
=== Srednjevekovna nauka ===
[[File:Brain, G Reisch.png|thumb|right|De potentiis anime sensitive, Gregor Reisch (1504) ''[[Margarita philosophica]]''. Medieval science mooted a [[Ventricular system|ventricle]] of the brain as the location for our [[common sense]],<ref>{{Citation
| last = Smith
| first = A. Mark
Red 49:
</ref> where the [[Theory of Forms|form]]s from our [[sensory system]]s commingled. ]]
[[File:Ibn al-Haytham.png|thumb|left|upright|[[Ibn al-Haytham]]'s "approach was essentially [[hypothetico-deductive model|hypothetico-deductive]]".<ref>{{harvnb|Smith|2001}} [http://www.jstor.org/stable/3657358?seq=114#page_scan_tab_contents pp.cxv-cxvi via JSTOR]</ref> ]]
During [[late antiquity]] and the [[early Middle Ages]], the Aristotelian approach to inquiries on natural phenomena was used. Some ancient knowledge was lost, or in some cases kept in obscurity, during the fall of the Roman Empire and periodic political struggles. However, the general fields of science, or [[natural philosophy]] as it was called, and much of the general knowledge from the ancient world remained preserved though the works of the early Latin encyclopedists like [[Isidore of Seville]]. Also, in the [[Byzantine empire]], many Greek science texts were preserved in [[Syriac]] translations done by groups such as Nestorians and Monophysites.<ref name="history natural philosophy">{{cite book|last=Grant|first=Edward|title=A History of Natural Philosophy: From the Ancient World to the Nineteenth Century|year=2007|publisher=Cambridge University Press|isbn=978-0-521-68957-1|pages=62–67}}</ref> Many of these were translated later on into Arabic under the [[Caliphate]], during which many types of classical learning were preserved and in some cases improved upon.<ref name="history natural philosophy" /><ref>Alhacen had access to the optics books of Euclid and Ptolemy, as is shown by the title of his lost work ''A Book in which I have Summarized the Science of Optics from the Two Books of Euclid and Ptolemy, to which I have added the Notions of the First Discourse which is Missing from Ptolemy's Book'' From
*"[Ibn al-Haytham] followed Ptolemy's bridge building ... into a grand synthesis of light and vision. Part of his effort consisted in devising ranges of experiments, of a kind probed before but now undertaken on larger scale."—H. Floris Cohen (2010){{rp|p.59}}
*[Ibn al-Haytham] (Alhacen) ''De Aspectibus'', see for example Book I, [6.38] "And all these points become clear with experimentation." {{harvnb|Smith|2001}}{{rp|[6.38]p.367}}
*[Ibn al-Haytham] (Alhacen) ''De Aspectibus'', see for example Book I, [6.36] "And if this phenomenon is experimentally scrutinized with great care, the result will be found to be what we have claimed." {{harvnb|Smith|2001}}{{rp|[6.36]p.366}}
*
*{{Cite journal|url = http://www.oxfordreference.com/|title = Science in Islam|last = Haq|first = Syed|date = 2009|journal = Oxford Dictionary of the Middle Ages|accessdate = 2014-10-22|doi = |pmid = |issn = 1703-7603|author-link = Nomanul Haq}}
*{{harvnb|Lindberg|1976}}{{rp|pp.60–67}}
*{{Cite book|title = The Optics of Ibn al-Haytham. Books I–II–III: On Direct Vision|last = Sabra|first = A. I.|publisher = The Warburg Institute, University of London|year = 1989|isbn = 0-85481-072-2|location = London|author-link =
== Znanstveni modeli, teorije, i zakoni ==
Red 253:
** [[Teologija]]
}}
== Napomene ==
{{reflist|group=nb}}
== Reference ==
|